Subject: Re: [3gv6] prefix delegation draft was: proposed 3gpp-ietf workshop

From: Behcet Sarikaya <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 14:18:06 -0800 (PST)

Hi Zhenqiang, 

>
>From: 李振强 <[email-masked]>
>To: "Laganier, Julien" <[email-masked]>; "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>; "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>; "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>
>Cc: "[email-masked]" <[email-masked]>
>Sent: Mon, February 1, 2010 8:56:39 PM
>Subject: Re: Re: [3gv6] prefix delegation draft was: proposed 3gpp-ietf workshop
>
>
>Hi, All,
> 
>The attachment is a discussion paper I submitted to 3GPP SA2 meeting in Shenzhen, China.  This paper lists all the solution alternatives and the related problems of each solution.
>Please check it and feed me back comments.

In your discussion paper, you stated:
> DHCPv6 is not required in current 3GPP specifications

This is why we submitted our contribution to  3gpp-ietf workshop: 
http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/workshop/2010-03-01_IPv4-to-IPv6_with-IETF/Docs/IPW100006.zip
which explains how DHCPv6 PD can be used in 3GPP

> Thus, UE has to obtain several /64 prefixes or a prefix with length less than 64 to satisfy the requirement.

I modified the contribution to explain how this requirement can be met using DHCPv6 PD. The new contribution should be posted soon.
 
Regards,
 
Behcet