Subject: [6lo] FW: Collecting input on future xml2rfc vocabulary

From: Samita Chakrabarti <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 08:58:00 +0000

Please provide your suggestions (if any) to the [email-masked]  for future xml2rfc vocabulary.
I personally think, it would have been cool if xml2rfc could add some vocabulary for  drawing tools (shapes and connectors, text box) to make the drawing easier.

FYI.

-Samita

-----Original Message-----
From: WGChairs [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of Heather Flanagan (RFC Series Editor)
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2014 10:36 AM
To: 'Working Group Chairs'
Subject: Collecting input on future xml2rfc vocabulary

Hello WG Chairs,

I would like to enlist your assistance in getting the word out to active authors about current efforts to update the xml2rfc vocabulary and DTD.
Some of the best input comes at the point when an author is trying to create a draft and finds themselves wishing that xml2rfc had a particular feature, or behaved in a different way.  Now is the best time to collect that information, since the RFC Format Design Team is in the process of recommending a variety of changes to support the new proposed formats for RFCs.

Authors should send their suggestions to the [email-masked] mailing list, where they will be discussed and then captured by the design team.  The archives of that list (available from
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/pipermail/rfc-interest/2014-January/thread.html>)
provide details on what has already been discussed.  The Design Team wiki (read-only) has also captured some of the discussion and decisions so far.  See:
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/rse/wiki/doku.php?id=design:xml-tags>.

Thank you for your help,
Heather Flanagan
RFC Series Editor