Subject: [6lo] SEC-DIR review of AP-ND: following the cryptographic chain

From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2020 13:26:59 +0000

Dear all

During SEC-DIR review, Benjamin pointed out:

> I worry a little bit that we haven't fully specified the entire list of steps the 6LR

> takes to follow the cryptographic chain and validate that the 6LN holds the key

> in question and registers the address in question to the Crypto-ID in question.  I

> don't have a specific thing in mind that the 6LR might forget, but if we

> explicitly state what things are bound to what other things, the 6LR is less likely

> to make a security-relevant mistake.

Any idea how we can address this?

Pascal