Subject: [6tisch] 6tisch architecture intended status

From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 08:40:46 +0000

Dear all

A question arises at DetNet about the intended status for the archicture. Quoting Lou:

"
The key difference is that from a process standpoint, PS means that the document goes through and IETF LC -- which makes the document and IETF consensus document which we agreed as important given the inter SDO relationship / nature of detnet.  Here's what I said in:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-detnet-architecture/shepherdwriteup/

This document has inter-IETF Areas and inter-SDO impact, most notably

with IEEE, and having this document be an IETF consensus document is

therefore considered highly important.
<

The same applies to the 6TiSCH architecture and it seems that we need to get the same level or review and ship as proposed standard.

And that's probably soon now.

Thoughts?

Pascal