Subject: Re: [Acme] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8555 (6321)

From: Megan Ferguson <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2020 13:18:35 -0500

Greetings,

FYI - this report has been deleted as junk.

Thank you.

RFC Editor/mf

On Oct 26, 2020, at 10:50 PM, RFC Errata System <[email-masked]> wrote:

> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8555,
> "Automatic Certificate Management Environment (ACME)".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6321
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: francis raguine <[email-masked]>
> 
> Section: 095ll210217
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> 
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> 
> 
> Notes
> -----
> 
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC8555 (draft-ietf-acme-acme-18)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Automatic Certificate Management Environment (ACME)
> Publication Date    : March 2019
> Author(s)           : R. Barnes, J. Hoffman-Andrews, D. McCarney, J. Kasten
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Automated Certificate Management Environment
> Area                : Security
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
>