Subject: [Acme] Status updates, working toward an agenda

From: "Salz, Rich" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 16:35:42 +0000

I think the WG should start to think about its future.  Below are some updates and questions.  Let’s discuss onlist and at the meeting in March.

If you look at our status page, https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/acme/documents/, most of the adopted documents are well along.  To summarize:

    draft-ietf-acme-uthority-token waiting for IESG review
    draft-ietf-acme-Authority-token-tnauthlist update just submitted, waiting for AD review
    draft-ietf-acme-dtnnodeid Dependent drafts now in RFC pipeline, update coming
    draft-ietf-acme-email-smime in RFC pipeline
    draft-ietf-acme-star-delegation new draft coming to address AD feedback
    draft-ietf-acme-integrations some discussion, https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/acme/?q=integrations
    draft-ietf-acme-client No update or discussions recently.

What should we do about the last two documents?

We have a couple of documents that the WG has not adopted. There hasn’t been much discussion of any of them since the last IETF virtual meeting.

    draft-biggs-acme-sso
    draft-friel-acme-subdomians
    draft-tweedale-acme-discovery
    draft-tweedale-acme-server-capabilities
(The last two are inter-related).

What should we do about these?

Do we want to say “we’re done, we’re successful, please move all new challenges to an appropriate group?”