Subject: [Anima] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC8995 (6736)

From: RFC Errata System <[email-masked]>
Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2021 15:18:59 -0800 (PST)

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8995,
"Bootstrapping Remote Secure Key Infrastructure (BRSKI)".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6736

--------------------------------------
Type: Editorial
Reported by: Michael Richardson <[email-masked]>

Section: 5.5

Original Text
-------------
MASA implementations SHOULD anticipate future media ntypes but, 
of course, will simply fail the request if those types are not 
yet known.

Corrected Text
--------------
MASA implementations SHOULD anticipate future media types but, 
of course, will simply fail the request if those types are not 
yet known.

Notes
-----
"ntypes" is not a word

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC8995 (draft-ietf-anima-bootstrapping-keyinfra-45)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Bootstrapping Remote Secure Key Infrastructure (BRSKI)
Publication Date    : May 2021
Author(s)           : M. Pritikin, M. Richardson, T. Eckert, M. Behringer, K. Watsen
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach
Area                : Operations and Management
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG