Subject: [apps-discuss] IETF 79 minutes

From: Peter Saint-Andre <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 14:16:20 -0700

Your lazy Area Directors have finally posted minutes for the AppsArea
session at IETF79:

http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/79/minutes/apparea.txt

Please ping Alexey and me regarding any corrections.

Thanks to Ted Hardie for scribing!

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/

---

From: SM <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 15:03:28 -0800

>http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/79/minutes/apparea.txt

Thanks LADs.

   "Barry mentions the three drafts already suggested:
    draft-nottingham-http-portal, Patrik Faltstrom's IDNAbis
    I-D (already discussed), and draft-merrit-jms-uri."

Is APPSAWG taking on draft-merrit-jms-uri as a work item?

Regards,
-sm

---

From: "Jiankang YAO" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 09:50:10 +0800

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "SM" <[email-masked]>
To: <[email-masked]>
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 7:03 AM
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] IETF 79 minutes

> Is APPSAWG taking on draft-merrit-jms-uri as a work item?

I think that it is suggestion or proposal.
yes, if  APPSAWG has the consensus to do it.

Jiankang Yao

> Regards,
> -sm
> 
> _______________________________________________
> apps-discuss mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss

---

From: Alexey Melnikov <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 18:51:56 +0000

>yes, if  APPSAWG has the consensus to do it.
After hearing the discussion about draft-merrit-jms-uri in Beijing I 
decided to progress it as an individual submission. However I would 
still appreciate more reviews of it.

---

From: Eric Johnson <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2010 11:06:28 -0800

Hi,

Just a small correction - I think you're referring below to

draft-merrick-jms-uri

(not merrit)
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-merrick-jms-uri/

-Eric.