Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] I-D Action: draft-ietf-appsawg-file-scheme-03.txt

From: t.petch <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 17:29:42 +0100

----- Original Message -----
From: "Matthew Kerwin" <[email-masked]>
To: "IETF Apps Discuss" <[email-masked]>
Cc: "Julian Reschke" <[email-masked]>
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2015 2:36 PM

> Hi folks,
>
> I've published a new version of the file: URI draft. I think it
addresses
> most of the comments received over the course of the exercise.
>
> If we could get some reviews at this stage it'd be greatly
appreciated. I'd
> like to think we're on the way towards WGLC; so if you have any
issues, now
> would be a great time to raise them.

Matthew

"Also see Appendix C.2 for a discussion on
   translating non-local file URIs to and from UNC stings."

Yup, I have been stung by UNCs many times:-)

"when [RFC1738] was made obsolete ..."
Well, the RFC Index has it 'Proposed Standard' even if it also lists two
RFC as obsoleting it!  'replaced' might be better

Tom Petch

, but that draft expired in 2005.  It enumerated concerns

>
> Cheers
>
> On 23 July 2015 at 22:45, <[email-masked]> wrote:
>
> >
> > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> > directories.
> >  This draft is a work item of the ART Area General Applications
Working
> > Group Working Group of the IETF.
> >
> >         Title           : The file URI Scheme
> >         Author          : Matthew Kerwin
> >         Filename        : draft-ietf-appsawg-file-scheme-03.txt
> >         Pages           : 20
> >         Date            : 2015-07-23
> >
> > Abstract:
> >    This document specifies the "file" Uniform Resource Identifier
(URI)
> >    scheme, obsoleting the definition in RFC 1738.
> >
> >    It attempts to define a common core which is intended to
interoperate
> >    across the broad spectrum of existing implementations, while at
the
> >    same time documenting other current practices.
> >
> >    *Note to Readers (To be removed by the RFC Editor)*
> >
> >    This draft should be discussed on the IETF Applications Area
Working
> >    Group discussion list <[email-masked]>.
> >
> >
> > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-appsawg-file-scheme/
> >
> > There's also a htmlized version available at:
> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-appsawg-file-scheme-03
> >
> > A diff from the previous version is available at:
> > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-appsawg-file-scheme-03
> >
> >
> > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> > submission
> > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> >
> > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > apps-discuss mailing list
> > [email-masked]
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss
> >
>
>
>
> --
>   Matthew Kerwin
>   http://matthew.kerwin.net.au/
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------

> _______________________________________________
> apps-discuss mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss
>