Subject: RE: [Asrg] RE: 2.a.1 Analysis of Actual Spam Data - Titan Key re duces spam attacks

From: "Peter Kay" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 14:41:15 -1000

Hey man, I'm just reporting, not passing judgement :), nor, might I add,
agreeing/disagreeing. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yakov Shafranovich [mailto:[email-masked]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2003 2:07 PM
> To: Peter Kay; [email-masked]
> Subject: RE: [Asrg] RE: 2.a.1 Analysis of Actual Spam Data - 
> Titan Key re duces spam attacks
> 
> 
> At 12:07 PM 8/13/2003, Peter Kay wrote:
> >Ok everyone, its decision time.
> >..........
> >
> >Our resident statistician, Terry Sullivan, basically says that the 
> >amount of noise on the data and the variances in spam make 
> it difficult 
> >if not impossible to statistically prove the above unless 
> the effect of 
> >the hard bounces is huge. And if the effect is so huge, why 
> hasn't it 
> >already been figured out? ..........
> 
> Wouldn't this apply to ALL anti-spam research efforts not 
> just this one? 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Asrg mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg
> 
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg