Subject: RE: AToM MIB WG Meeting Summary

From: "C. M. Heard" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 09:06:45 -0700 (PDT)

On Sat, 19 Jul 2003, C. M. Heard wrote:
> >>>>> On Sat, 19 Jul 2003, Orly Nicklass wrote:
> Orly> There were only 3 TC with no sufficient feedback:
> Orly> AtmIlmiNetworkPrefix, AtmInterfaceType and
> Orly> AtmSigDescrParamIndex. AtmAddr had a single reporting user.
> 
> I presume that what this means is that only those three TCs had
> reports of at least two implementations.  That's interesting.

The sentence above should have read:

  I presume that what this means is that only those four TCs lacked
  reports of at least two implementations.  That's interesting.

Sorry for any confusion.

//cmh