Subject: Breaking News:: Natural remedy normalizes blood sugar

From: Stroke PSA <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 14:42:37 -0700

Associated Heart Disease Journal
Breaking News: Released July 16, 2014

Posted - Results of a Stroke Prevention Study were Released this morning.
Study confirmed that blood pressure was lowered with this common food . . . 

View what food Here: / http://www.eldreamy.com/blood/pressure/psa.video

Stroke Study >> Cure >> Video -> http://www.eldreamy.com/blood/pressure/psa.video

message settings w/ EOJ Relations
four zero two Mill St. Bremen, OH four three one zero seven 
or http://www.eldreamy.com/k4ktk.4jtjt

- 
-
-
-
-
-
I just want to learn it to see if it stands up to its hype, to be honest. I've seen how flexible both of them are, and I've seen experts do some pretty crazy stuff in them, and I want to see if it's worth the learning Hmm. The problem is that there is so much of Emacs... but the thing I still leave an IDE for to use emacs is complex series of repetitive tasks, which I automate using macro recording. For example you can take a current word or expression, copy that into a "buffer" (think cut / paste only you can have more than one), then go into another file, type some text partly using the copied value and then another previously copied value as well, advance the cursor, save the position and return to the first buffer again... then repeat the process for the KHG: Vim excels at using macros for exactly those sorts of repetitive text-editing tasks (arguably, it's even better than Emacs, as you generally will need far fewer keystrokes to set up the macro) I have used Macros heavily in b
 oth vi and Emacs. What you are missing is the fact that Emacs has a far wider selection of methods to access while using macros, and the fact that you can use cut buffers everywhere - even in the middle of search terms for example. Please tell me how you would write a macro that would select one word of an expression based on a regex, take the found term, search another document on that term and then do helmstetter-gelner - that is possible with vimscript, or the languages vim has bindings for (like ruby/vim/tcl/perl). You have access to all of vim's functions and editor buffers from the scripting languages.  @Kendall: qq/{re}^M:let found = matchstr({re})^M:e {another-document}^M:exec "%g/\C\V" . escape(found, '\\') . "/{replacement}/"^Mq. Presumably you'd want to parameterize {found}, {another-document}, and {replacement}, which you could do by generating the macro text in a function. Then you do something like let @q = MakeReplacementMacro('WTF', 'emacs-vs-vim.txt', 'FTW'), at whi
 ch point you can just hit @q to utilize this That's impressive but to do the same in Emacs requires only using the keystrokes I already know to form a complex macro, instead of having to write it out by hand. It's easy for anyone that knows emacs to make a macro that does that task but I would say there are not a lot of VI users that could construct the macro you laid out without a fair amount of research.