Subject: Jailed For - Curing Diabetes

From: Anti-Body Kills Diabetes <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 09:02:45 -0800

Atompub-archive - 9847- 9847 -9847 http://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/

Diabetes Reversing Anti-Body Discovered

If your head is on a merge commit (ex: merged branch feature into master), git reset --hard~1 will point the master branch to the last commit inside the feature branch. In this case the specific commit ID should be used instead of the relative command. result of merging the master branch into the feature branch first, testing and then (fast-forward) merging onsider noting that the number in HEAD~1 can be substituted to any positive integer, e.g. HEAD~3. It may seem obvious, but beginners (like me) are very careful when running git commands, so they may not Could someone comment on "what if you have already pushed the commit?". Is this answer still valid, or does that make it all more difficult? epository locally. For git every repository so the state of the remote repo is irrelevant. Then, if you want to push the changes, it will complain that "Updates were rejected because the tip of your curre
nt branch is behind its remote counte

05 December 2014

Ask•A•Scientist

What was once speculation is now scietific fact. You can end your insulin dependency, and eliminate the root cause of your suffering.

This medical team recently pinpointed the exact root cause of diabetes, and even after almost being jailed are still releasing the findings.

The protocol below will show you how to attack the root cause.

http://www.journal/Diabetes-Center-Center/us-874

This message was intended for [email-masked]. If you are not the intended recipient please delete this message immediately. If you are not interested in these notices please update your settings. TME Services

999 Lightfoot RD Lufkin, TX 75901

I wouldn't call that communication either. Git is like the C language; it gives you a lot of power and expects you to be responsible with it. If people don't know how to be responsible, or refuse to be, then things will be awkward. The nice thing about Git, though, is that you can't really trash the whole team's repo, because everyone has the repo. In a centralized repository, if you roll back some changes, nobody can get them back. In Git, even if I have a question about your answer. You say that "git reset --soft" "not only leaves your files alone, it even leaves your index alone. When you do git status, you'll see that the same files are in the index as before. In fact, right after this command, you could do git commit and you'd be redoing the same commit you just had." But if "git reset --soft" doesn't change the index, "git commit" wouldn't do anything. Do you mean "git commit
-a" (assuming there had been no changes in the working directory beforerhaps one way to look at it is that there are three things working here: Your files, your index, and your history (that is, your branch pointer). Let's say you're at commit C (as above). Your files, index, and branch pointer match. If you use git reset --soft HEAD~1, your branch pointer moves back to B, but your files and index stay at their versions in C. If you use git reset --mixed HEAD~1, your branch pointer and index move back to B, but your files stay in their state at C. Then your files show changes but your index doesn't. git reset --hard HEAD~1 moves all three back.