Subject: In time for Wedding-Season

From: DocOz Fat-Melting Episode <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 09:22:52 -0800

"A slimmer body is the key to Happiness"
Doc Oz Devotes Entire Episode to this...

Oz designed a "Melt 1-lb a day" plan will Not Backfire. 
================================================

The 1-Step that will get you there -> http://www.saygoddbyewithbean.com/putty/countermanded/centripetal.html

Studies have shown that people are happier after they lose more than 10 lbs. 
Doc Oz combines the 2 in just 1 step for you. 

- The OZ Blog

to modify message settings w/ Update Notice Messages
write to 118 Kecks Lane|Ruff Dale| Pennsylvania |1 5 6 7 9  or http://www.saygoddbyewithbean.com/straightener/toeless/jugglery/basketballs/parishioner/mechanic.htm

Was this something the people who designed Java intentionally did (as an Easter egg?) It's just a bit mind-blowing that you could possibly product the Hello, world String, which just happens to be the most favourite string in any programming languages.   One Two Three Mar 3 '13 at 4:44 
@OneTwoThree It's entirely possible that it's an easter egg, but keep in mind that the seed is a long, meaning that there's 2^64 different possible seeds from which to choose.   Vulcan Mar 3 '13 at 4:50
@Vulcan - the javadoc says that the seed is 48 bits And besides, the actual seeds are 32 bit values.   Stephen C Maach element of the random number sequence is taken modulo 27, and there are 6 elements in each o and "world\0". If you assumed a truly random generator, the odds would be 1 in 27^6 (387,420,489) of getting the sequence you were looking for -- so it's pretty impressive but not quite mind-blowing!   Russell Borogove Mar 3 '13 at 7:48This reminds me of Jake in T10:03
@RussellBorogove: But with those odds, and 2^64 possible seeds, there are an expecteed values that give that sequence. It's just a matter of finding one.   dan04 Mar 3  I wasn't quite willing to make that estimate; depending on the implementation of the PRNG, the size of the seed word might not equal the size of the state, and sequence paths might not be evenly distributed. But still, the odds are definitely good, and if you couldn't find a pair you could try again with different casing ("Hello" "World"), or using 122-k instead of 96+k, or...   Russell Borogove Mar 3 '13 at 18:15This is for testing purposes as far as I know. hree It's almost always very important that a random number generator can be predictable when needed, as it's very hard to test things otherwise, as running the same code twice can produce different results. Using seeds in PRNGs means you can use a specific seed when testing (or at least report the seed so a result can be reproduced), and then later you can use a
  seed which will change - e.g. new Random() uses a seed taken from the current time.   DarkOtter Mar 4 '13 at 8:55@RussellBorogove you make me know i'm dumber   kingdango 0:42Note that the javadoc does not specify the exact details of the implementation. Hence you cannot rely on this being portable across JVM implementations.   n Ravn Andersen Aug 26 '13 at avnAndersen The Javadoc specifies that "particular algorithms are specified for the class RandomJava implementations must use all the algorithms shown here for the class Random, for the sake of absolute portability of Java code."   Vulcan Aug 27 '13 at 3:05 notice that the generated seeds are all very close to Long.MAX_VALUE. It'd be interesting to find out how many different seeds could generate each string, but I have nowhere near the processing capability to achieve that in a reasonable, timely fashion.   VulcanWhy does it have to be .nextInt(27) ? What is so special about the number 27? I thought if you just called nextInt(),
  you'd get a bigger chance of finding the seed? Plus, why are you only checking the first x numbers of a sequence (where x == goal.length())?   One Two Three M@OneTwoThree nextInt(27) means within the range [0, 26].   at 21:48@Vulcan Most seeds are very close to the maximum value, just like if you select random numbers between 1 and 1000, most numbers you end up picking will have three digits. It's not surprising, when you think about it :)   @Vulcan In fact if you do the math you'll see they are about as close to the maximum value as to zero (I suppose the seed is being interpreted as an unsigned in the generation code). But because the number of digits grow only logarithmically with the actual value, the number looks really close when it really isn't.   Thomas Mar 3 '13 @Vulcan Actually it's "close" tIf you start from zero, you'll get these:    Alvin Wong Mar 4 '13 at 7:02
@Vulcan the seed is actually only 48bit long. And,s not cryptography. If you use a few cleaver tricks, you can calculate all the seeds on home computer within minutes.r 4 '13 at 7:11
"1" and "2" appear much more frequently, for a similar reason: to go from 9 to 10 takes a much smaller factor than from 10 to 20. In this case, to go from 0 to int.max/10 takes much less than to go fromWhy did you use base?   : to have a larger range of possible values  Great answer. And for bonus points, can you find a seed that will initialize a Random which will produce the sequence of 4 seeds required for initialization of the final randoms?   M@Marek: I don't think gods of pseudo