Subject: Re: [BEHAVE] Modified EUI-64 format

From: Jari Arkko <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:55:46 +0300

Bob Hinden wrote:
>> I agree with Brian that the Behave WG should leave the u/l bit alone
>> unless 6man decides to change the address architecture, which is a BIG
>> decision.  I am not confident of that happening any time soon,
>> whereas Behave needs to progress rapidly.
>>     
>
> +1
>   
+1 and sorry for the late reply. I'm now cleaning up my inbox and going 
through everything...

Jari