Subject: [BLISS] Comments on draft-ietf-bliss-call-park-extension-01.txt

From: Gonzalo Camarillo <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2010 13:13:17 +0200

Hi,

a few comments on the following draft:

http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-bliss-call-park-extension-01.txt

Abstract:  "An additional URI parameter is also described".
Replace described with specified or defined.

Actually, Informational RFCs cannot define SIP URI parameters. As
stated in Section 7.1 of draft-peterson-rai-rfc3427bis, a standards
track RFC is needed.

Section 2: s/section 2.15/Section 2.15/ and perform a similar change
throughout the document.

I guess Section 6 has been included in the document as a historical
reference. Can we move that information to an appendix?

Cheers,

Gonzalo