Subject: [bmwg] Re: [Sipping] Comments on draft-malas-performance-metrics-05.txt

From: "Vijay K. Gurbani" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2006 15:02:40 -0600

Jean-Francois Mule wrote:
> --- Template for metrics to guide extensibility:
> Given the wg acknowledged that the draft should only focus on the most
> widely supported and useable metrics, and that many will come up with
> other specific things, it would be useful to define how other metrics
> should be defined by vendors, operators.
> This could be a simple paragraph providing some kind of template: metric
> name, 3 or 4 letter abbreviation, problem statement or motivation, what
> is measured, how, in what units and optionally, if it can be averaged,
> specify how.

There is complementary work in the bmwg WG that touches upon
other metrics.  Please see the following two companion
documents:

http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-poretsky-sip-bench-term-02.txt
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-poretsky-sip-bench-term-02.txt

At least for right now, the bmwg drafts and the sipping drafts
are tracking each other closely.

Thanks.

- vijay
-- 
Vijay K. Gurbani  vkg@{lucent.com,research.bell-labs.com,acm.org}
Bell Laboratories, Lucent Technologies, Inc.
2701 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9F-546, Lisle, Illinois 60532 (USA)

_______________________________________________
bmwg mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg