Subject: Correction: (was Re: [Capwap] VSPs in capwap)

From: "Scott G. Kelly" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 13:14:27 -0800 (GMT-08:00)

Should have said "length field following the ElementId", not "...following the value"

-----Original Message-----
>From: "Scott G. Kelly" <[email-masked]>
>Sent: Mar 30, 2006 1:10 PM
>To: capwap <[email-masked]>
>Subject: [Capwap] VSPs in capwap
>
>Currently, there is a vendor-specific payload defined for capwap (section 4.3.2.1.1). The struct definition would look like this:
>
>struct vsp
>{
>    uint32_t  VendorId;
>    uint16_t  ElementId;
>    uint8_t   Value[];
>};
>
>Is there some reason not to have a length field following the value, so that these can be stepped over if desired?
>
>--Scott
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
>http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap
>
>Archives: http://lists.frascone.com/pipermail/capwap

_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap

Archives: http://lists.frascone.com/pipermail/capwap