Subject: Re: [Capwap] NAT-T

From: "Scott G. Kelly" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 09:13:07 -0800 (GMT-08:00)

Correction:

>We could do this by placing the same session ID as used for the control channel into the data
> channel capwap header, but this header will be encrypted once dtls starts, adding some complexity
> to packet handling. 

Doh! We won't be encrypting the data channel, so that's wrong, but the rest of the discussion remains the same. Sorry about that, must need more coffee :-)

Scott

_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap

Archives: http://lists.frascone.com/pipermail/capwap