Subject: RE: [Capwap] minor edits and questions capwapp protocol specifica tion

From: Michael Montemurro <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 12:50:30 -0500

I created issue 81 as a bug to address these comments.

Cheers,

	Mike 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] 
> Sent: March 11, 2006 8:28 AM
> To: Pat Calhoun (pacalhou)
> Cc: [email-masked]
> Subject: [Capwap] minor edits and questions capwapp protocol 
> specification
> 
> 
> Very Readable -- some minor comments
> 
> Page 33 -- Section 5.1 -- 5th paragraph
> 
> If a Discovery Response .... equal to SilentInterval before 
> sending further Discovery Request messages.
> 
> change to
> If a Discovery Response .... equal to SilentInterval before 
> returning to the ide stand and sending further Discovery 
> Request messages.
> 
> 
> Section 5.1.5 WTP Frame Type -- Page 37 - Local Bridging
> 
> What do the frames look like -- do not understand what is 
> sent or received.
> 
> Page 51 -- Top of Page -- Secton 7.3.2
> 
> cause repeated twice -- delete 1st reference
> 
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
> http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap
> 
> Archives: http://lists.frascone.com/pipermail/capwap
> 
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap

Archives: http://lists.frascone.com/pipermail/capwap