Subject: Re: [Capwap] Proposed resolution to Issue 140 - use of VLAN name

From: "Pat Calhoun (pacalhou)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 10:42:07 -0700

I disagree with this change. The reason why a name is better is that the
ID may differ across WTPs, while representing the same "user group". For
instance, engineering folks may be set to VLAN 101 on one set of WTPs,
but 201 on others (based on geography). I believe that the use of the
name is a more scalable approach that your proposed change.

Pat Calhoun
CTO, Wireless Networking Business Unit
Cisco Systems

________________________________

	From: Michael Montemurro [mailto:[email-masked]] 
	Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2006 12:01 PM
	To: capwap
	Subject: [Capwap] Proposed resolution to Issue 140 - use of VLAN
name

	In section 4.4.8, I propose that we change VLAN name to VLAN
Identifier ( as described in IEEE 802.1D).
	 
	Cheers,
	 
	Mike

_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap

Archives: http://lists.frascone.com/pipermail/capwap