Subject: Re: [Capwap] Proposed resolution to issue 194 - duplicate IPv4 address.

From: "Pat Calhoun (pacalhou)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2006 10:42:05 -0700

The text needs to be clearer than that, I believe. If you are planning
on adding such language, we need to discuss when the WTP considers the
event cleared. A WTP that determines a conflict would generate such an
event, but it could be that the same event occurs, possible with another
host on the network, days later. A single event being triggered the
first time would not be sufficient.

Pat Calhoun
CTO, Wireless Networking Business Unit
Cisco Systems

________________________________

	From: Michael Montemurro [mailto:[email-masked]] 
	Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2006 11:31 AM
	To: capwap
	Subject: [Capwap] Proposed resolution to issue 194 - duplicate
IPv4 address.

	I propose that we add a sentence to sections 4.4.19 and 4.4.20
to indicated that the message is transmitted only once.
	 
	Cheers,
	 
	Mike

_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap

Archives: http://lists.frascone.com/pipermail/capwap