Subject: Re: [Cellar] namespace considerations for ebml's definition of EBML Schema

From: Reto Kromer <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 10:43:40 +0200

Steve Lhomme wrote:

>Or even https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8794
>when it's published.

I suggest to use that one right now.

>If you want a IETF URN rather than the IETF URL for this RFC,
>then "urn:ietf:rfc:8794" sounds nice. It matches the ABNF in
>RFC648.

If..., then I would agree with "urn:ietf:rfc:8794". Yet I
personally prefer the URL solution.

Best regards, Reto