Subject: Re: [Cfrg] new fECC draft version

From: David McGrew <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 13:45:17 -0700

On Apr 15, 2010, at 1:37 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:

> An inconsistancy between the ID and your saag drafts.
>
> draft-mcgrew-fundamental-ecc-02.txt sec 6.2
>
> states that "KT-I is mathematically and functionally equivalent to  
> ECDSA"
>
> But your saag slide 12 states the opposite, that KT-IV is equivalent.
>
> Which is it?
>

The draft is right, the slide is wrong.  Sorry for the confusion.

David

>
>
> On 03/22/2010 12:39 PM, David McGrew wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> a new version of the draft is available. Comments are welcome;  
>> please copy this list.
>>
>> http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-mcgrew-fundamental-ecc-02.txt
>>
>> David
>> _______________________________________________
>> Cfrg mailing list
>> [email-masked]
>> http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/cfrg
>>