Subject: [clue] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-clue-protocol-17: (with COMMENT)

From: Mirja Kühlewind <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2018 12:38:10 -0700

Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-clue-protocol-17: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)

Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.

The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-clue-protocol/

----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Update: Revising my discuss, as I missed the pointer to draft-ietf-clue-signaling. Sorry for that!

Two minor editorial commets:

1) In the terminology section: What does MCU actually stand for?

2) sec 4:
"CLUE protocol version numbers are
   characterized by a major version number (single digit) and a minor
   version number (single digit)..."
However, later on the text says that the numbers can also consist of multiple digits...