Subject: [COSE] Amendments to the minutes

From: "Jim Schaad" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 22:37:45 -0800

First:  Thanks Hannes they have been useful to me.

Small changes:

OLD:
Carsten: Kathleen says for a very good reason for having RSA1.5 being
          included. It shouldn't be included in new protocol.

NEW:
Carsten: Kathleen says there needs to be a very good reason for having
RSA1.5 being
          included. It shouldn't be included in new protocol.

Actual jabber comment:

[07:01:34] <Kathleen Moriarty> mic: I'd like to see a very good reason for
it if RSA v1.5 is included
[07:01:55] <Kathleen Moriarty> shouldn't be in new protocols

OLD:
Sean: We need to keep this simpler her.
NEW:
Sean: We need to keep this simple here.

OLD:
Issue#23: Is 'keyops' sufficient or should we add a 'use' field (which
          was added for the W3C).
NEW:
Issue#23: Is 'keyops' sufficient or should we add back the 'use' field from
JOSE (keyops was added for the W3C).