Subject: Re: [Cwt-reg-review] Request to register claims for PSA attestation

From: Hannes Tschofenig <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 13:10:49 +0000

I do not see a problem in registering the referenced claims because they belong to the number range in the registry with the policy "specification required" and there is a specification available. The proposed entries are not conflicting with others in the registry and the information provided in the draft is complete.

Ciao
Hannes

PS: Being a co-author of the draft listed below, I am a bit biased.

From: Cwt-reg-review <[email-masked]> On Behalf Of Thomas Fossati
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2022 1:45 PM
To: [email-masked]
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: [Cwt-reg-review] Request to register claims for PSA attestation

Dear CWT Designated Experts,

We'd like to submit a request to register seven new claims used in PSA attestation [1].

The details for the registration are in Section 11.1 of the PSA attestation I-D [2].

Let us know if you need more info.

Cheers, thanks!

[1]  https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-tschofenig-rats-psa-token-09.html
[2] https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-tschofenig-rats-psa-token-09.html#section-11.1

IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.