Subject: Re: [Detnet] draft-wetterwald-detnet-utilities-reqs-01

From: "Vengada Prasad Govindan (venggovi)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2014 10:58:28 +0000

Hello Patrick,
   Thank you for the document, please consider the following comments below:
General:
It would help to have a diagram explaining the network architecture/
topology in addition to the requirements.

01/ Sec 4.2.1.1.1 : No diagram for latency budget, the text refers to one.
02/ Sec 4.2.1.1.2 : s/Asymetric/Asymmetric (many occurrences)
03/ Sec 4.2.1.1.2.1: s/ carteristics/characteristics
04/ Sec 4.2.1.1.2.2: What performance metrics are to be monitored? It would be helpful to list them here
05/ What is the signaling protocol referred to in Sec 4.2.1.2? Does it run over UDP/ TCP?
06/ A few acronyms need to be expanded/ referenced e.g. GOOSE, CT/ VT. It may help to add a Definitions section.
07/ The definition of Redundancy is too broad - will there be specific requirements to redundancy e.g. link redundancy. (Sec 4.2.1.1.2.1)

Will add more comments on the remaining sections in a follow-up email.
Thanks
Prasad

From: detnet [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of Patrick Wetterwald (pwetterw)
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 8:56 PM
To: [email-masked]
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: [Detnet] draft-wetterwald-detnet-utilities-reqs-01

Dear all,

Please notice that we submitted a new draft that is summarizing the deterministic networking requirements from the smart grid perspective.

The document could be found here:

http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wetterwald-detnet-utilities-reqs/

Many thanks,

Jean and Patrick