Subject: Re: [Detnet] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-detnet-flow-information-model-13: (with COMMENT)

From: Balázs Varga A <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 16:51:33 +0000

Hi Barry,
Many thanks for your comment. I will change the reference to normative.
Cheers
Bala'zs

Ps: changes can be seen on GitHub:
https://github.com/detnet-wg/draft-ietf-detnet-flow-information-model/commit/7855ea01b1fec25ed1d4f0089bd990dc4b14ff1b

-----Original Message-----
From: Barry Leiba via Datatracker <[email-masked]> 
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2020 5:28 AM
To: The IESG <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked]; [email-masked]; [email-masked]; Lou Berger <[email-masked]>; [email-masked]
Subject: Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-detnet-flow-information-model-13: (with COMMENT)

Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-detnet-flow-information-model-13: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.)

Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.

The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-detnet-flow-information-model/

----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I agree with Álvaro that IEEE8021Qcc should be normative.