Subject: Re: [Detnet] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-detnet-flow-information-model-13: (with COMMENT)

From: Balázs Varga A <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 16:51:26 +0000

Hi Alvaro,
Thanks for the comment. I will change the reference as normative.
Cheers
Bala'zs

Ps: changes can be seen on GitHub:
https://github.com/detnet-wg/draft-ietf-detnet-flow-information-model/commit/7855ea01b1fec25ed1d4f0089bd990dc4b14ff1b

-----Original Message-----
From: Alvaro Retana via Datatracker <[email-masked]> 
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2020 12:32 PM
To: The IESG <[email-masked]>
Cc: [email-masked]; [email-masked]; [email-masked]; Lou Berger <[email-masked]>
Subject: Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-detnet-flow-information-model-13: (with COMMENT)

Alvaro Retana has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-detnet-flow-information-model-13: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.)

Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.

The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-detnet-flow-information-model/

----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

The "models described in this document are based on [IEEE8021Qcc]".  Why is that reference not Normative?