Subject: RE: [dhcwg] option 116 and 249

From: "Van Aken Dirk" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 09:51:24 +0100

Option 249 (= Option 121) is implemented in Microsoft XP ...

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf
Of
> Andre Kostur
> Sent: donderdag 19 januari 2006 20:21
> To: Sanjeev Verma
> Cc: dhcwg
> Subject: Re: [dhcwg] option 116 and 249
> 
> Sanjeev Verma wrote:
> > Hi,
> >   Are these two options - 116 and 249 - standardized? I assume 249
is
> > not but perhaps 116 is. Can someone point out the RFC for it.
> > thanks,
> >
> 
> Option 116 - RFC 2563
> 
> Option 249 - Not defined by RFC.. appears to have been used in the
past
> for Classless Static Routes (which is now option 121, RFC 3442)
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg