Subject: [dhcwg] Support for Link Selection Relay Suboption?

From: Richard Johnson <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 10:46:21 -0700

A quick question for the group:

How much support is there currently for the Link Selection Relay  
Suboption [RFC3527] in DHCP Servers made by various vendors?  I know  
Cisco supports it.  What other companies do?

/raj

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

---

From: Andre Kostur <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 10:53:59 -0700

> Cisco supports it.  What other companies do?

Incognito Software supports it.
_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

---

From: "David W. Hankins" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 11:48:27 -0700

> Cisco supports it.  What other companies do?

ISC DHCP doesn't.

-- 
David W. Hankins		"If you don't do it right the first time,
Software Engineer			you'll just have to do it again."
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.		-- Jack T. Hankins
_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

---

From: Ted Lemon <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 11:57:11 -0700

> ISC DHCP doesn't.
Are you sure?   I thought I'd implemented that way back.   The Nominum 
server certainly supports it.

---

From: "David W. Hankins" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 12:40:23 -0700

> server certainly supports it.

We support the link selection option (118), but not the relay agent
sub-option (82.5).