Subject: [dhcwg] 3GPP discussion

From: "Wes Beebee (wbeebee)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 12:39:10 -0500

Shouldn't the PD discussion for 3GPP be moved to v6ops?
 
It seems to me to be related to IPv6 CE Routers...
 
Thanks,
 
- Wes
 
Wes Beebee
Software Engineer
Product Development
[email-masked]

United States
Cisco.com - http://www.cisco.com
For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html

---

From: Alan Kavanagh <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:50:10 -0400

Given that this is dealing with PD, it makes sense to me to have it in DHC WG. This is not for CE Routers per say but for 3GPP UE devices.

Alan

-----Original Message-----
From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of Wes Beebee (wbeebee)
Sent: March 25, 2010 1:39 PM
To: Suresh Krishnan
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: [dhcwg] 3GPP discussion

 
Thanks,
 
- Wes
 
Wes Beebee
Software Engineer
Product Development
[email-masked]

United States

---

From: "Wes Beebee (wbeebee)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 13:15:26 -0500

I guess my point is that these phones are now acting as CE Routers and
the issues he was discussing are covered in:

http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-cpe-router-04.txt

Thanks,

- Wes

Wes Beebee
Software Engineer
Product Development
[email-masked]

United States

-----Original Message-----
From: Alan Kavanagh [mailto:[email-masked]] 
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 1:50 PM
To: Wes Beebee (wbeebee); Suresh Krishnan
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: RE: 3GPP discussion

Given that this is dealing with PD, it makes sense to me to have it in
DHC WG. This is not for CE Routers per say but for 3GPP UE devices.

Alan

-----Original Message-----
From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf
Of Wes Beebee (wbeebee)
Sent: March 25, 2010 1:39 PM
To: Suresh Krishnan
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: [dhcwg] 3GPP discussion

 
Thanks,
 
- Wes
 
Wes Beebee
Software Engineer
Product Development
[email-masked]

United States

---

From: Suresh Krishnan <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 14:34:55 -0400

Hi Wes,
  This document is more of a recommendation for provisioning the prefixes on the Delegating Router than for the requesting router. The requesting router behavior is not changed at all and hence Ido not think this is relevant to the CPE router discussion. That said, I agree with you that we probably need to present this in v6ops.

Thanks
Suresh

________________________________
From: Wes Beebee (wbeebee) [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2010 10:39 AM
To: Suresh Krishnan
Cc: [email-masked]
Subject: 3GPP discussion

Thanks,

- Wes

Wes Beebee
Software Engineer
Product Development
[email-masked]

United States