Subject: Re: [dhcwg] draft-ietf-dhc-vpn-option-12.txt

From: Ralph Droms <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 01:26:49 +0000

Let me know what you decide to do.  I won't bug the IESG to review the DISCUSSes (of course) if it's going back for another WG last call.

- Ralph

On Oct 22, 2010, at 3:58 AM 10/22/10, Ted Lemon wrote:

> On Oct 21, 2010, at 9:29 PM, Kim Kinnear wrote:
>> Other than solving that problem, the changes were many but,
>> at least in my view, clarified but did not change the intent
>> of the draft.
> 
> They do place some substantial new requirements on the server, though.   I think it needs review and another last call.
> 
> Diffs are available here:
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dhc-vpn-option-12.txt
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg