Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC Results - draft-ietf-dhc-option-guidelines-11

From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 03:16:05 +0000

Thanks to all of those that responded with support for moving this document forward.

In my opinion, this document does have consensus to move forward. However, there were several extensive reviews which raised some points that will need to be addressed. Once those are incorporated into a -12, we will do another (perhaps shorter last call) to confirm those changes and make a final determination.

- Bernie

-----Original Message-----
From: [email-masked] [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of Bernie Volz (volz)
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2013 11:06 AM
To: [email-masked]
Subject: [dhcwg] WGLC - draft-ietf-dhc-option-guidelines-11 - Respond by April 24

Folks, the authors of draft-ietf-dhc-option-guidelines-11,
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dhc-option-guidelines-11, feel it's ready for a WGLC.  There's been discussion and comment already, but more eyes on and a "final" review of this work are required to advance it.

This document is critical as it provides guidance to others in the IETF that may not be DHCP "experts" when they need to write a DHCP option internet-draft.

At the time of this writing, there is no IPR reported against this draft.

Please review the draft and indicate whether or not you feel it is ready to be published. Your response matters to the process, so please do respond.

As Tomek is an author, I will evaluate consensus after April 24, 2013.

Thanks!

-	Bernie

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg