Subject: [dhcwg] WGLC Results for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-privacy-01, draft-ietf-dhc-dhcp-privacy-01 and draft-ietf-dhc-anonymity-profile-03

From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 16:59:13 +0000

Hi:

After a review of the comments received and past WG discussions related to these drafts, I (as Tomek is a co-author) do believe there is sufficient consensus in the WG to advance all 3 documents after the issues raised are addressed. We also have a request out to the perpass mailing list to review these documents (requested late, on 9/16), and may receive some additional feedback on the documents.

The authors of these documents are requested to review the comments received, update the documents, and once all issues are acceptably addressed, I will generate the shepherd documents and request publication (which will trigger AD review ...).

-          Bernie

From: dhcwg [mailto:[email-masked]] On Behalf Of Bernie Volz (volz)
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2015 12:36 PM
To: [email-masked]
Subject: [dhcwg] Reminder - 3 WGLC active (respond by September 22nd)

Hi:

Just a reminder that we have WGLCs for the following 3 documents ended September 22nd:

1.       draft-ietf-dhc-anonymity-profile-03, Anonymity profile for DHCP clients, http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dhc-anonymity-profile-03. This document's intended status is Standards Track. At present, there is 1 IPR filed against this document.

2.       draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-privacy-01, Privacy considerations for DHCPv6, http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-privacy-01. This document's intended status is Informational. At present, there is no IPR file against this document.

3.       draft-ietf-dhc-dhcp-privacy-01, Privacy considerations for DHCPv4  --  http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dhc-dhcp-privacy-01. This document's intended status is Informational. At present, there is no IPR file against this document.

Please send your comments by September 22th, 2015. If you do not feel this  document should advance, please state your reasons why.

Thanks!

-          Tomek & Bernie