Subject: Re: [dhcwg] IETF-96 (Berlin) DHC WG Session - requesting slot for DHCPv6 failover

From: Tomek Mrugalski <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 20:49:09 +0200

Title: Next Steps for DHCPv6 failover
Presenter: Tomek Mrugalski
Related drafts: draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-protocol-01
Time Required: 10 mins
Purpose of Session: to ask people why there was no response during WGLC
and determine what the next steps are

The question I'd like to ask will be:
Do people think this is no longer a problem that needs solving?
Should authors continue the work on it or abandon?
Is there anything authors could do to make the I-D more review friendly?

Tomek

On 27.04.2016 19:07, Bernie Volz (volz) wrote:
>
> Hi:
>
>  
>
> We are planning to request a 2 hour time slot for the DHC WG for
> IETF-96 (Berlin). Please submit agenda requests as soon as you can if
> you do plan to present at the DHC WG session in Berlin.
>
>  
>
> As in the past, please provide:
>
>  
>
> Title Of Session:
>
> Presenter:
>
> Related Drafts:
>
> Time Required:
>
> Purpose of Session:
>
>  
>
> We do want to remind those requesting time that you should focus on
> discussing key issues that need resolution to move a draft forward.
>
>  
>
> You can view the working agenda at
> https://github.com/dhcwg/wg/wiki/IETF-96-(Berlin)-DHC-WG-Agenda
> <https://github.com/dhcwg/wg/wiki/IETF-96-%28Berlin%29-DHC-WG-Agenda>.
>
>  
>
> We are now less than 3 months from that next meeting.
>
>  
>
> Thanks!
>
>  
>
> -          Tomek & Bernie
>