Subject: [dhcwg] WG meeting follow-up - draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis (3/3)

From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 19:44:34 +0000

Hi:

At IETF-97 (Seoul) I presented several issues that had been raised by reviewers during the WGLC of draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis-05.

The third was regarding IPsec Encryption Protocol (section 19.1 of draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis-05).

Here are the Etherpad notes taken by Tim Chown and others:

- IPsec encryption protocol (136)
  Proposal: drop text in from draft-ietf-dhc-relay-server-security-01
  Only issue is that doc isn't done yet

Action: will again confirm the proposed action on the list.

Please read https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dhc-relay-server-security-01 (while technically the WGLC on this document was supposed to end on Nov 9th, Tomek has not yet issued the results of that WGLC (most likely it would not pass as there were no comments, other than from author, on this work). We would really like to use this text in draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis.

In this case, the default action would be to leave it unspecified as to what encryption protocol to use, which likely will cause an issue during AD review, IETF LC, or IESG review on draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis.

See slide #6 at https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/97/slides/slides-97-dhc-dhcpv6bis-open-issues-discussion-01.pdf.

-          Bernie (for the bis team)