Subject: [dns-privacy] Tsvart telechat review of draft-ietf-dprive-padding-policy-05

From: Magnus Westerlund <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2018 05:49:56 -0700

Reviewer: Magnus Westerlund
Review result: Ready with Nits

This is a follow up to the previous review:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-dprive-padding-policy-04-tsvart-lc-westerlund-2018-04-04/

Thanks for resolving the previously raised issues.

I did notice in Section 4.1 that the following paragraph:

   The Block Size will interact with the MTU size.  Especially for
   length values that are a large fraction of the MTU, unless the block
   length is chosen so that a multiple just fits into the MTU, Block
   Length Padding may cause unneccessary fragmentation for UDP based
   delivery.  Also, chosing a block length larger than the MTU of course
   forces to always fragment.

Is repeated with just one paragraph between them.