Subject: [dns-privacy] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8932 (6629)

From: RFC Errata System <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2021 05:35:22 -0700 (PDT)

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8932,
"Recommendations for DNS Privacy Service Operators".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6629

--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: Joeri de Ruiter <[email-masked]>

Section: B.1.

Original Text
-------------
One example would be to replace all TCP/UDP port
numbers with one of two fixed values indicating whether the
original port was ephemeral (>=1024) or nonephemeral (>1024).

Corrected Text
--------------
One example would be to replace all TCP/UDP port
numbers with one of two fixed values indicating whether the
original port was ephemeral (>=1024) or nonephemeral (<1024).

Notes
-----
Nonephemeral port numbers are <1024

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC8932 (draft-ietf-dprive-bcp-op-14)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Recommendations for DNS Privacy Service Operators
Publication Date    : October 2020
Author(s)           : S. Dickinson, B. Overeinder, R. van Rijswijk-Deij, A. Mankin
Category            : BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
Source              : DNS PRIVate Exchange
Area                : Internet
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG