Subject: Re: amortization quake

From: "Rufina Branton" <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 08:20:26 -0500

http://www.reassuri.com
 
Lev
Xa
CIA
Am
Pro
Me
So
VA
VIA
itra
nax
LIS
bien
pecia
ridia
ma
LIUM
GRA
 $9
 $1
 $9
 $6
 $6
 $9
 $7
 $8
 $6
9.95
23.45
9.95
8.00
4.95
9.95
5.95
5.45
9.95

blunt instrument. Walsh is good. Better than that, but that doesnt
concern us. What he pulled out of Mo does-again with a but. Its not in
Panovs recapturing what he revealed because we have to assume he
revealed almost everything I told him. Instead, its in what he repeated
having heard. Conklin separated several pages. Heres an example. The
family will be pleased ... our supreme will give us his blessing. Hes
repeating someone elses words, not his own. Now, Mo isnt familiar with
criminal jargon, certainly not to the point where he would automatically
make a connection, but the connections there. Take the word supreme and
change it by removing one vowel and inserting another. Supremo-capo
supremo, hardly a heavenly supreme being. Suddenly, the family is light
years away from Norman Rockwell, and blessing is interchangeable with a
reward or a