Subject: Re: [ebxml-dev] RE: [ebxml-msg] RE: AS3?....

From: "E.B. Dreger" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 01:34:27 +0000 (GMT)

> Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 16:22:39 -0800
> From: "Ahmed, Zahid" <[email-masked]>

> I question how viable FTP really is w.r.t. firewall, DMZ/network, 

Passive FTP in a restricted port range handles this nicely.

> and message authentication policies of many companies

IPSec or SSL-enriched FTP

> though for ebXML type of transport option.

I would, however, like to see the arguments for FTP.  Everyone
is familiar with HTTP.  There's S/MIME.  Yes, FTP works... but is
it really the best model for message passing?

Eddy

Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division
Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita/(Inter)national
Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence
--

Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT)
From: A Trap <[email-masked]>
To: [email-masked]
Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature.

These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots.  Do NOT
send mail to <[email-masked]>, or you are likely to be blocked.

Eddy

Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division
Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita/(Inter)national
Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence
--

Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT)
From: A Trap <[email-masked]>
To: [email-masked]
Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature.

These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots.  Do NOT
send mail to <[email-masked]>, or you are likely to be blocked.