Subject: Re: [Emu] I-D Action: draft-ietf-emu-aka-pfs-05.txt

From: John Mattsson <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2021 10:17:25 +0000

Hi,

Seems to be consensus in the security area to recommend not using the term Perfect Forward Secrecy (PFS).

https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/saag/6ImeENhteXGdLsnaJHRoN6LW1zk/

Following this the draft should be updated to talk about "forward secrecy" and maybe have considerations regarding key exfitration.
Cheers,
John