Subject: Re: [EToSat] [QUIC performance and SATCOM]

From: Joerg Deutschmann <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 16:48:51 +0100

Dear all,

thanks for the link to this interesting paper. We did some related work, 
which you might be interested in. It will be presented at the NetSys 
2019 conference [1]. A version is available at [2].

While your "QUIC and SATCOM" paper provides more details regarding 
HTTP/2 vs. QUIC, we took a broader view. We measured page load times 
over HTTP(S)/1.1 and HTTP/2, with and without VPNs. Additionally we set 
up two Quic servers (Chromium QUIC and quic-go). All tests were run with 
three different satellite internet providers, showing quite some 
differences...

Best regards,
Joerg

[1] www.netsys2019.org
[2] www7content.cs.fau.de/~deutschmann/NetSys2019_preprint.pdf

On 09.11.18 04:35, Kuhn Nicolas wrote:
> Dear all,
> 
> We have recently posted on ArXiv an article on QUIC and its performance 
> over a GEO SATCOM link.
> 
> https://arxiv.org/pdf/1810.04970.pdf
> 
> This paper has been presented at IETF 103 @MAPRG 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/103/materials/agenda-103-maprg-00
> 
> The code used to run these experiments is available, so do not hesitate 
> to contact us if you want to reproduce our experiments.
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Ludovic Thomas (ISAE-SUPAERO), Emmanuel Dubois (CNES), Nicolas Kuhn 
> (CNES), Emmanuel Lochin (ISAE-SUPAERO)
>