Subject: Re: FW: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-fax-tiff-fx-02.txt

From: Fumitaka Ono <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 31 Aug 99 08:55:58 +0900

Dear James,
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:	James Rafferty [SMTP:[email-masked]]
> > Sent:	Thursday, August 19, 1999 7:29 AM
> > To:	Ietf-Fax
> > Subject:	Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-fax-tiff-fx-02.txt
> > 
> > Folks,   
> > 
> > Please review the latest issuance of this document.    
> > 
> > In particular, there has been a change made to the text regarding
> > the default which would apply for the compression tag when its 
> > value is set to 9 (JBIG) as noted below in an excerpt from Annex C of the
> > document:  
> > 
> > "On the recommendation of the JBIG committee of ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG1, 
> > made T82Options = 0 (the default value) correspond to the T.85 
> > application profile; made corresponding changes in 5.4 and 8.5. 
> > The committee rationalized that T.85 is the minimum T.82 profile 
> > and it is also the most widely implemented profile." 
> > 
> > This is a change from the last rev as discussed at the Oslo WG 
> > meeting.   
> > 
> > The need to treat the various profiles of JBIG distinctly in TIFF-FX
> > seems essential; the key question is whether the approach 
> > contained in the document is the right way to go.   
> > 
> > As discussed
> > at Oslo, this kind of relatively small change that is an outgrowth 
> > of implementation experience would not cause the draft to recycle 
> > to proposed std.   
> > 
> > Please comment as to whether this change is supported by 
> > the members of this list.  
> > 
I perfectly support this change.
Regards,
Fumitaka Ono
(Mitsubishi Electric Corp.)

> > Thanks,  
> > 
> > James
> > 
> > At 07:03 AM 8/17/99 -0400, you wrote:
> > >A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> > directories.
> > >This draft is a work item of the Internet Fax Working Group of the IETF.
> > >
> > >	Title		: File Format for Internet Fax 
> > >	Author(s)	: R. Buckley,  D. Venable, S. Zilles,  L. McIntyre, 
> > >                          G. Parsons, J. Rafferty
> > >	Filename	: draft-ietf-fax-tiff-fx-02.txt
> > >	Pages		: 84
> > >	Date		: 16-Aug-99
> > >	
> > >This document is a revised version of Proposed Standard RFC 2301.
> > >The revisions, summarized in the list attached as Annex C to this 
> > >document, are based on the discussions and suggestions for improvements 
> > >that have been made since the Proposed Standard was issued in March 1998,
> > and on the results of independent implementations and interoperability
> > testing.
> > 
> > *------------------------------------------------*
> > James Rafferty			
> > President, Human Communications LLC
> > 12 Kevin Drive			
> > Danbury, CT  06811-2901		
> > USA					
> > Voice/Fax:  +1-203-746-4367
> > Fax to email:  +1-603-925-5753  (Current Preferred Fax Number)
> > Email/Internet Fax:  [email-masked]
> > Alternate email : [email-masked],
> >  [email-masked] (chg from csi.com)
> > 
> > HC Web Site:  http://humancomm.com 
> > *---------------------------------------------------
> 

---------------End of Original Message-----------------

--------------------------------------------------------------
Fumitaka ONO
Information Rendering Tech. Dept.
Information Technology R&D Center TEL:+81-467-41-2950
Mitsubishi Electric Corp. FAX:+81-467-41-2287
5-1-1 Ofuna, Kamakura, Kanagawa E-mail:[email-masked]
247-8501 JAPAN
**PLS use [email-masked] instead of [email-masked]
--------------------------------------------------------------