Subject: RE: [Gen-art] re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt- dnsdomain-03.txt

From: "Gray, Eric" <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2006 12:54:10 -0400

Renxiang,

	You should consult with Jari and the applicable WG chairs,
before taking direct action on these last call comments.  Jari 
has already replied that the draft will be "re-cycled" through
the WG(s) for review again.

--
Eric 

--> -----Original Message-----
--> From: CTO YAN Renxiang [mailto:[email-masked]] 
--> Sent: Friday, September 29, 2006 8:56 PM
--> To: Gray, Eric
--> Cc: [email-masked]; Jari Arkko
--> Subject: [Gen-art] re: Gen-ART LC review of 
--> draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain-03.txt
--> 
--> Hi, Eric,
--> 
--> Thanks for the review.
--> 
--> We will revise the draft to resolve the issues and and ask 
--> for WG review 
--> when it's ready.
--> 
--> Regards,
--> Renxiang
--> 
--> > -----原始邮件-----
--> > 发件人: Gray, Eric [mailto:[email-masked]]
--> > 发送时间: 2006年9月29日 23:32
--> > 收件人: CTO YAN Renxiang; SSMD Jiang YingLan; CTO Gui 
--> > Luoning; Xiaodong
--> > Duan
--> > 抄送: [email-masked]; Jari Arkko
--> > 主题: Gen-ART LC review of 
--> draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain-03.txt
--> > 
--> > 
--> > Authors,
--> > 
--> > 	I am the the assigned General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) 
--> > reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see 
--> > http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). 
--> > 
--> > 	Please resolve these comments along with any other Last 
--> > Call comments you may receive. 
--> > 
--> > 
--> > 
--> > Document: 
--> > --------
--> > 
--> >             Domain Suffix Option for DHCPv6
--> >       <draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain-03.txt>
--> > 
--> > Reviewer: Eric Gray
--> > 
--> > Review Date: 9/30/2006
--> > 
--> > IETF LC Date: through 10/10/2006
--> > 
--> > Summary:
--> > -------
--> > 
--> > 	This draft is not quite ready for publication as a 
--> > Proposed Standard. 
--> > 
--> > Comments:  
--> > 
--> > 	The relatively minor shortcomings of this draft have been
--> > exhaustively digested on the following lists:
--> > 
--> > 	DHC Working Group ([email-masked])
--> > 	IETF-Announce ([email-masked])
--> > 	IETF-Discussion ([email-masked])
--> > 
--> > People commenting in the (public) discussion include all of the 
--> > following (no special order - some complaining, some defending):
--> > 
--> > 	John C Klensin
--> > 	Frank Ellermann
--> > 	Jeffrey Hutzelman
--> > 	Ralph Droms
--> > 	Matt Larson
--> > 	David W Hankins
--> > 	Dave Crocker
--> > 	Fred Baker
--> > 	Harald Alvestrand
--> > 	Keith Moore
--> > 	Stig Venaas
--> > 
--> > 	The draft is 5 pages long - meaning that it has less than two 
--> > pages of non-template content.
--> > 
--> > 	If any one thing has emerged consistently in the discussion,
--> > it is that there are some areas that need clearing up.  I 
--> have been
--> > following the discussion, and have reviewed the document 
--> itself.  I
--> > have nothing new to add to this discussion except to congratulate 
--> > the authors on having created so succinct an Internet Draft as a
--> > candidate for Proposed Standard.
--> > 
--> > 	However, I fully support Ralph Droms' suggestion that the ID
--> > be taken back under the DHC working group aegis (cooperating with 
--> > the DNSOP working group) and modified - per his suggestions - i.e.
--> > 
--> > 	1. clarify the use case motivating this option
--> > 	2. clarify/reword the phrase "domain suffix"
--> > 	3. simplify the reference to RFC 1035 encoding
--> > 
--> > I would add to this, in addition, that the clarifications 
--> referred 
--> > to in number 2 above should include clarifying the entire phrase 
--> > starting with:
--> > 
--> > "The domain suffix in the 'domain suffix' field MUST 
--> include only one
--> >  item, ..."
--> > 
--> > 	From the discussion, I believe that phrases "domain suffix" and 
--> > "one item" both need some clarification.
--> > 
--> > --
--> > Eric Gray
--> > 
--> > 
--> > 
--> > 
--> > 
--> > 
--> 
--> _______________________________________________
--> Gen-art mailing list
--> [email-masked]
--> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art
--> 

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art