Subject: [Gen-art] Genart review: draft-ietf-pce-of-06

From: Robert Sparks <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 10:03:36 -0600

I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)
reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see
http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html).

Please wait for direction from your document shepherd
or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-pce-of-06
Reviewer: Robert Sparks
Review Date:  9 Jan 2009
IESG Telechat date: 15 Jan 2009

Summary: Ready for publication

Major issues:  none
Minor issues:  none
Nits/editorial comments:

Only 2 things left to comment on:

1) Your edit for the extra ')' in the Objective functions got more  
than you intended.
      Objective function code 3 is now correct, but you need to put a  
')' back into
      the definition for Objective function code 2.
      (The diff at http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?difftype=--hwdiff&url2=http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-pce-of-06.txt
       makes this easy to see)

2) I assume the alignment with the [PCE] bnf (specifically the  
addition of the
<attribute-list> clause isn't something that needs WG re-review?

_______________________________________________
Gen-art mailing list
[email-masked]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art