Subject: [Gen-art] draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata-05

From: "McCann Peter-A001034" <[email-masked]>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2009 17:36:59 -0400

The -05 version did not address my one technical comment
in Section 11:

AUID in the i= flag must always have an '@' sign according to the ABNF
in section 10.  The example AUIDs given ("sub.example.com" and
"sub1.sub2.example.com") are missing this.  Technically, I guess you
should say "the domain part of the AUID" instead of just "the AUID".

A couple of my editorial comments were also not addressed, mainly the
indentation of text in Section 9, 11, 13, and 14.

-Pete