Subject: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-cheshire-dnsext-special-names-01

From: "Vijay K. Gurbani" <[email-masked]>
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 11:18:56 -0600

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
<http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Document: draft-cheshire-dnsext-special-names-01
Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani
Review Date: Jan-28-2011
IETF LC End Date: Feb-14-2011
IESG Telechat date: Feb-17-2011

Summary: This draft is ready as a Proposed Standard.

Major issues: 0
Minor issues: 0
Nits/editorial comments: 2

1) S1, should the top-level pseudo-domain "invalid" be ".invalid"
  instead?

2) This draft states that rfc2606 does not state how
  implementations should treat TLDs and second-level domain
  names defined in rfc2606.  This draft further goes on to establish
  procedures on what it means to say that a DNS name is
  reserved for special use.  I am curious in that is there any
  draft that goes back and explains the special domain names in
  rfc2606?

Thanks,

- vijay
-- 
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
1960 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9C-533, Naperville, Illinois 60566 (USA)
Email: vkg@{bell-labs.com,acm.org} / [email-masked]
Web:   http://ect.bell-labs.com/who/vkg/