Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-merkle-tls-brainpool-02

From: Jari Arkko <[email-masked]>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 20:07:05 +0300

Roni, Johannes - thank you. These reviews are important for me to form an opinion, and it is good to see that the comments were addressed. I have placed a no-objection ballot for this draft.

Jari

On Jul 2, 2013, at 3:23 PM, Johannes Merkle <[email-masked]> wrote:

> a new version addressing your review is on its way.
> 
> Johannes
> 
> 
> Roni Even schrieb am 30.06.2013 08:44:
>> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
>> <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.
>> 
>> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive.
>> 
>> Document: draft-merkle-tls-brainpool-02
>> 
>> Reviewer: Roni Even
>> 
>> Review Date:2013–6–30
>> 
>> IETF LC End Date: 2013-7–23
>> 
>> IESG Telechat date:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as Standard track RFC.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Major issues:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Minor issues:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> In section 1 you reference TLS 1.0 and 1.1 usage based on RFC 4492. What about TLS 1.2 usage specified in RFC5246 A.7
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Nits/editorial comments:
>> 
>> 1. In section 3 the  registry name is EC Named Curve
>> 2. In section 3 change “suitability” to “suitable”
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> Mit freundlichen Grüßen,
> Dr. Johannes Merkle
> Principal Beratung, Elektronische Identitäten
> Public Sector
> secunet Security Networks AG
> Mergenthaler Allee 77
> 65760 Eschborn
> Germany
> Telefon +49 201 54 54-3091
> Telefax +49 201 54 54-1325
> Mobil   +49 175 2224439
> [email-masked]
> www.secunet.com
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art