Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review for draft-ietf-tls-prohibiting-rc4-01

From: Jari Arkko <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 11:16:47 +0200

Thanks for your review, Dan. And I agree, and have placed a Yes position on the ballot for this document.

Jari

On 08 Dec 2014, at 21:10, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) <[email-masked]> wrote:

> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
> Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at
>  
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__wiki.tools.ietf.org_area_gen_trac_wiki_GenArtfaq&d=AAICAg&c=BFpWQw8bsuKpl1SgiZH64Q&r=I4dzGxR31OcNXCJfQzvlsiLQfucBXRucPvdrphpBsFA&m=R08EeqLx_DlnxiFeFYaaohVRh4i-O7FUlf7SY_h1pNA&s=T3fAQj3qjlnAEhXKaSRyrfFwfpZxKxkN2faPO7d49Ko&e= >.
>  
> Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
> you may receive.
>  
> Document: draft-ietf-tls-prohibiting-rc4-01
> Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
> Review Date: 12/8/2014
> IETF LC End Date: 12/10/2014
> IESG Telechat date: N/A
>  
> Summary: Ready with nits
>  
> This is a clear and straightforward document, which requires the client and server TLS implementations to not use the RC4 cipher suites, and lists in an appendix the cipher suites defined for TLS use RC4
>  
>  
> Major issues:
>  
> None
>  
> Minor issues:
>  
> None
>  
> Nits/editorial comments:
>  
> There is one nit easy to fix – bracketed references of the RFCs updated by this document. are used in the Abstract. These need to be replaced by textual references to the RFCs.
>  
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art