Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-ccamp-additional-signal-type-g709v3-04

From: Jari Arkko <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 10:14:07 +0300

Ron,

Many thanks for you review.

> 
> Major Issues: I think that we are ready for publication.

Ok.

> But can someone confirm that it is OK to update the registry from an INFORMATIONAL RFC? I think that it is, because the registry policy is:
> 
> Standards Action for Standards Track documents, Specification Required  for other documents

Yes, I believe that is the case.

Jari