Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-clue-rtp-mapping-10

From: Jari Arkko <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 23:09:09 +0200

> Summary: Ready with nits.
> 
> Major issues: 0
> 
> Minor issues: 0
> 
> Nits/editorial comments:
> - S1: s/source of Media, such as from one or more Capture
> Devices./source of Media from one or more Capture Devices./
> - S1: s/SIP offer answer/SIP Offer/Answer model/
> - S1: s/recommendations, for the CLUE architecture, about
> how/recommendations for the CLUE architecture on how/
> - S4: s/have main and slides video sources can/have a primary video
> source and a slide video source can/
> - S5: s/CaptureIDis/CaptureID is/

Thanks for your review, Vijay!

Authors, I didn’t see changes related to these observations
in the new document versions… were the comments missed?
While they were small editorial comments, they all made sense
to me at least ;-)

I have balloted no-objection for this document on tomorrow’s
IESG telechat.

Jari