Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-pce-association-group-09

From: Alissa Cooper <[email-masked]>
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 14:31:42 -0400

Meral, thanks for your review. Dhruv, thanks for your response. I entered a No Objection ballot.

Alissa

> On Jun 6, 2019, at 1:19 PM, Meral Shirazipour <[email-masked]> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
>  Thanks for clarifying.
> 
> Best,
> Meral
> 
> On 6/5/19, 11:42 PM, "Dhruv Dhody" <[email-masked]> wrote:
> 
>    Hi Meral,
> 
>    Thanks for your review.
> 
>> Nits/editorial comments:
>> 
>> It could help to clarify if this proposal brings any new requirements on existing LSP OAM/path protection techniques, or brings the need for extensions.
> 
>    Associating LSPs together to form a association group in the context
>    of PCEP does not have any impact on the OAM. This association is in
>    the context of LSP path computation and does not impact the data
>    plane.
> 
>    Regarding the impact on path protection, it is best to discuss that in
>    the context of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-path-protection, where the
>    association-type for path protection is defined. That document is
>    under shepherd review and it would be wise to add some text there. I
>    have added the draft authors in cc to consider this.
> 
>    Regards,
>    Dhruv
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gen-art mailing list
> [email-masked]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art